Skip to main content

Old Ben Coal Company v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, and James E. Hilliard

7th CircuitMay 31, 2002No. 00-3222Cited 30 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Ripple, Manion, Wood
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful Termination

Outcome

The Seventh Circuit reversed the Benefits Review Board and remanded the case, holding that the ALJ applied an overly restrictive legal standard for modification petitions under the Black Lung Benefits Act and that the modification petition should have been reopened and decided on the merits.

What This Ruling Means

Based on the limited information provided, this case involved Old Ben Coal Company challenging a decision made by the federal Office of Workers' Compensation Programs regarding employee James E. Hilliard's workers' compensation claim. **What Happened:** Old Ben Coal Company disagreed with a ruling by the U.S. Department of Labor's workers' compensation office concerning one of their employees, James E. Hilliard. The company took their dispute to the federal appeals court in 2002, seeking to overturn the government agency's decision. **What the Court Decided:** Unfortunately, the court's final ruling and reasoning are not available in the provided information, so the specific outcome cannot be determined from these details. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case represents the type of legal battle that can occur when employers challenge workers' compensation decisions. When employees file for workers' compensation benefits, employers sometimes dispute these claims through the court system. These cases demonstrate that the workers' compensation process can involve multiple levels of review, including federal agencies and appeals courts. Workers should understand that their employers may legally challenge compensation decisions, but government agencies and courts exist to ensure fair outcomes in these disputes.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.