No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The Fourth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for South Carolina Electric & Gas Company, holding that salaried administrative employees remained exempt from FLSA overtime requirements even when temporarily assigned to perform nonexempt tasks during plant outages, as their primary duties remained administrative when assessed over the appropriate business cycle.
Counts v. South Carolina Electric & Gas Company (2003)
What Happened
Electric utility workers sued South Carolina Electric & Gas Company for unpaid overtime. These employees were classified as salaried administrative workers, but during plant outages, they were temporarily assigned to perform hands-on maintenance and repair work that would normally qualify for overtime pay. The workers argued they should receive overtime compensation for these periods when they performed non-administrative tasks.
What the Court Decided
The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the company. The court found that these salaried employees remained exempt from overtime requirements under federal wage laws, even when temporarily doing manual work during outages. The court explained that what matters is the employee's primary job duties over the entire business cycle, not just during temporary assignments.
Why This Matters for Workers
This ruling shows that temporary work assignments don't automatically change your overtime eligibility. If you're classified as an exempt salaried employee, performing different tasks for short periods likely won't make you eligible for overtime pay. Your overall job classification and primary responsibilities throughout the year determine your overtime rights, not just what you do during busy periods or special projects.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.