Skip to main content

Former Employees of Motorola Ceramic Products v. United States

Federal CircuitJuly 24, 2003No. 02-1223Cited 88 times
Plaintiff WinMotorola
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Clevenger, Rader, Dyk
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The appellants secured a consent order remanding the case to the Department of Labor, which upon remand awarded them Worker Adjustment Assistance benefits. The court held they are prevailing parties under EAJA entitled to attorney's fees.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Former employees of Motorola Ceramic Products filed a lawsuit after losing their jobs. They applied for Worker Adjustment Assistance benefits from the Department of Labor, which provides financial help and job training for workers who lose their jobs due to foreign trade. Initially, the Department of Labor denied their application for these benefits. **What the Court Decided** The court ruled in favor of the former Motorola employees. The case was sent back to the Department of Labor, which then approved the workers for Worker Adjustment Assistance benefits. Additionally, the court determined that because the workers won their case, they were entitled to have their attorney's fees paid under a law called the Equal Access to Justice Act. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling is important because it shows that workers can successfully challenge government decisions that deny them benefits they deserve. When workers lose their jobs due to trade-related reasons, they may be entitled to special assistance programs. If the government wrongly denies these benefits, workers can fight back in court. Even better, if they win, they may not have to pay their own legal costs, making it more affordable to seek justice.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.