Skip to main content

Madasu v. Berry Co. & BellSouth Advertising & Publishing Co.

Ala. Civ. App.August 11, 2006No. 2050350Cited 1 time
Defendant WinThe Berry Company and BellSouth Advertising and Publishing Company
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Crawley, Thompson, Pittman, Bryan, Murdock
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The trial court's dismissal of Dr. Madasu's claims based on an outbound forum-selection clause was affirmed. The appellate court held that Dr. Madasu, as a third-party beneficiary of the contract between Dr. Swindle and BAPCO, was bound by the forum-selection clause requiring litigation in Georgia, and that enforcement was neither unfair nor unreasonable.

What This Ruling Means

# Madasu v. Berry Co. & BellSouth Advertising & Publishing Co. Summary **What Happened** Dr. Madasu sued The Berry Company and BellSouth Advertising & Publishing Company (BAPCO) over a breach of contract. However, the original contract was between Dr. Swindle and BAPCO, not between Dr. Madasu and the companies. Dr. Madasu claimed he had rights under this contract even though he wasn't a direct party to it. **What the Court Decided** The court ruled against Dr. Madasu and upheld the dismissal of his case. The court found that even though Dr. Madasu may have had some rights related to the contract, he was still bound by a clause requiring any disputes to be handled in Georgia courts. The court determined this requirement was fair and reasonable. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case shows that contract terms—especially rules about where disputes must be handled—can apply even to people who didn't directly sign the agreement. Workers should be aware that contract clauses can affect their rights, sometimes in unexpected ways.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Breach of Contract cases

Similar Rulings

James Chappel v. Laboratory Corporation of America, AKA National Health Lab
9th CircuitNov 2000
Mixed Result
Umland v. PLANCO Financial Services, Inc.
3rd CircuitSep 2008
Defendant Win
Monroe County Board of Education v. Barbarietta Turner-Pugh
Ala. Civ. App.Jun 2026
Defendant Win
Alabama Department of Labor v. Betty's Cleaning & Lawn Care, LLC
Ala. Civ. App.Oct 2015
Defendant Win
Salatto
Ala. Civ. App.Oct 2011
Defendant Win
Read Full OpinionMore The Berry Company and BellSouth Advertising and Publishing Company RulingsAll Rulings

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

Check My RightsLearn the Basics

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.