Skip to main content

Elaine L. Chao, Secretary of Labor v. Double Jj Resort Ranch

6th CircuitJuly 9, 2004No. 02-2068Cited 19 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Martin, Clay, Mills
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The Secretary of Labor prevailed in her appeal. The Sixth Circuit reversed the district court's grant of summary judgment and found that Double JJ Resort Ranch is not exempt from Fair Labor Standards Act minimum wage and overtime requirements, as it is a resort hotel rather than an amusement or recreational establishment.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** The U.S. Department of Labor sued Double JJ Resort Ranch, claiming the company wasn't paying its workers minimum wage and overtime as required by federal law. The resort argued it didn't have to follow these wage rules because it qualified as an "amusement or recreational establishment," which has different requirements under the Fair Labor Standards Act. **The Court's Decision** The Court of Appeals sided with the Department of Labor. The court ruled that Double JJ Resort Ranch is actually a resort hotel, not an amusement park or recreational facility. This means the company must follow standard federal wage laws, including paying minimum wage and overtime to eligible employees. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling clarifies an important distinction for hospitality workers. Just because a business offers recreational activities doesn't mean it can avoid paying proper wages. Resort hotels with amenities like pools, activities, or entertainment still must follow regular wage and hour laws. Workers at similar establishments can use this decision to ensure they're being paid fairly and receiving overtime when they work more than 40 hours per week.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.