Skip to main content

Commissioner of Labor v. C.J.M. Services, Inc.

Conn.March 23, 2004No. SC 16880Cited 16 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage TheftBreach of Contract

Outcome

The Connecticut Supreme Court affirmed the Appellate Court's determination that the Commissioner of Labor had statutory authority under Connecticut law to bring suit against a general contractor and its surety for unpaid prevailing and overtime wages owed to subcontractor employees, and reversed part of the trial court's dismissal by finding the contract liability count was legally sufficient to survive a motion to strike.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** The Connecticut Commissioner of Labor sued C.J.M. Services, Inc., a general contractor, over unpaid wages owed to workers employed by subcontractors on a project. The workers hadn't received their proper prevailing wages (the required minimum pay rates for public construction projects) and overtime pay. The Commissioner argued that the general contractor was responsible for these unpaid wages, even though the workers were employed by subcontractors rather than directly by C.J.M. Services. **What the Court Decided** The Connecticut Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Commissioner of Labor. The court confirmed that the Commissioner had the legal authority under Connecticut law to sue general contractors for unpaid prevailing wages and overtime owed to subcontractor employees. The court also found that the contract-based claims against the company were legally valid and could proceed. **Why This Matters for Workers** This decision strengthens protections for construction workers on public projects. It means that even if you work for a subcontractor, the main general contractor can be held responsible when your wages aren't paid properly. This gives workers an additional avenue to recover unpaid wages and makes it harder for contractors to avoid responsibility by hiring subcontractors who don't pay fair wages.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Commissioner of Labor v. C.J.M. Services, Inc. from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.