Aretha Tucker v. Union of Needletrades, Industrial, and Textile Employees
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Suhrheinrich, Gilman, Ackerman
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- appeal
- State
- Ohio
- Circuit
- Sixth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The Sixth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for the union defendants, holding that plaintiff was not covered by the collective bargaining agreement because she was an employee of a subordinate affiliate (Joint Board) rather than the signatory employer (UNITE) at the time of termination, and rejecting her untimely promissory-estoppel argument raised for the first time at summary judgment.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.