Skip to main content

Uninsured Employers' Fund v. Danner

Md. Ct. Spec. App.September 8, 2004No. No. 1315Cited 3 times
Plaintiff WinTimothy Stivers
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Eyler, Krauser, Moylan
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage TheftBreach of Contract

Outcome

The Court of Special Appeals affirmed the Circuit Court's decision requiring the Uninsured Employers' Fund to pay workers' compensation benefits awarded to the claimant and upholding penalties for the Fund's failure to pay within the statutory timeframe.

What This Ruling Means

# Uninsured Employers' Fund v. Danner (2004) **What Happened** A worker filed a claim for workers' compensation benefits after being injured. The Uninsured Employers' Fund—an organization that pays benefits when employers don't carry proper insurance—was responsible for covering the claim. However, the Fund failed to pay the benefits on time and did not follow the legal deadline requirements. **What the Court Decided** The court sided with the worker. The appeals court confirmed that the Fund must pay the full workers' compensation benefits owed. The court also upheld penalties against the Fund for missing the deadline to make these payments. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling reinforces that workers have a right to timely payment of benefits they've earned. When organizations responsible for paying injured workers fail to meet legal deadlines, they can face penalties. This decision strengthens worker protections by holding the system accountable for delays, ensuring injured employees aren't left waiting for money they depend on during recovery.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft casesBreach of Contract cases

Similar Rulings

James Chappel v. Laboratory Corporation of America, AKA National Health Lab
9th CircuitNov 2000
Mixed Result
Elizabeth F. Smith v. First Union National Bank
1st CircuitJan 2000
Mixed Result
Umland v. PLANCO Financial Services, Inc.
3rd CircuitSep 2008
Defendant Win
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey
2nd CircuitSep 2014
Defendant Win
Irizarry v. Catsimatidis
2nd CircuitJul 2013
Mixed Result
Read Full OpinionMore Timothy Stivers RulingsAll Rulings

Browse Related

More wage theft casesMore construction employer cases

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

Check My RightsLearn the Basics

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.