Spradley v. The Owens-Illinois Hourly Employees Welfare Benefit Plan
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Lucero, McKAY, Tymkovich
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- appeal
- Circuit
- Tenth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The district court concluded that the employee was eligible for permanent and total disability life insurance benefits under the unambiguous language of the ERISA plan, and the Tenth Circuit affirmed, holding the plan administrator's denial arbitrary and capricious for relying on healthcare coverage provisions rather than the specific PTD benefit provisions.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.