Skip to main content

Stone & Webster Construction, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Labor

11th CircuitJune 19, 2012No. 11-11885Cited 46 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Dubina, Edmondson, Goldberg
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

WhistleblowerRetaliation

Outcome

The Administrative Review Board found in favor of the employee (Speegle) on liability, determining that the employer's stated reasons for termination were pretextual and that the employee suffered disparate treatment compared to similarly situated employees. The Court of Appeals granted the employer's petition for review and remanded the case to the ARB for reconsideration of the substantial evidence standard, vacating the liability finding but not addressing damages already awarded.

What This Ruling Means

**Stone & Webster Construction vs. Department of Labor: What Workers Need to Know** This case involved a dispute between Stone & Webster Construction and the U.S. Department of Labor over prevailing wage requirements on federal construction projects. Prevailing wages are the standard hourly rates that must be paid to workers on government-funded construction jobs, designed to ensure fair pay and prevent contractors from undercutting local wage standards. Stone & Webster Construction challenged the Department of Labor's determination of what wages should be paid to workers on their federal projects. The company disagreed with the wage rates the government said they had to pay their employees. The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued a mixed ruling, meaning some parts favored the construction company while others supported the Department of Labor's position. The court examined how federal agencies determine appropriate wage levels for government construction work. This case matters for construction workers because it affects how prevailing wages are calculated and enforced on federal projects. These wage determinations directly impact paychecks for thousands of workers on government-funded construction jobs. When contractors challenge these wage requirements, it can influence whether workers receive the full pay rates intended by federal prevailing wage laws, which are designed to protect workers from below-market compensation on taxpayer-funded projects.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.