Skip to main content

IBEW Local Union No. 102 v. Quality Electric and Data Inc

3rd CircuitJuly 17, 2012No. 11-3164
Defendant WinQuality Electric & Data, Inc.$201,424.4 at issue
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Fuentes, Hardiman, Rendell
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The Third Circuit affirmed summary judgment against Quality Electric, holding that the company was bound by the union's collective bargaining agreement to make pension contributions for all employees working within the union's trade and geographic jurisdiction, regardless of union membership status.

What This Ruling Means

**Union Wins Fight Over Required Pension Contributions** This case involved a dispute between IBEW Local Union No. 102 and Quality Electric & Data, Inc. over pension contributions. The union claimed that Quality Electric was required to make pension contributions for all workers performing electrical work within the union's geographic area, even if those workers weren't union members. Quality Electric argued they only had to contribute for actual union members. The court ruled in favor of the union. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals decided that Quality Electric was bound by the collective bargaining agreement and must make pension contributions for all employees doing union-covered work in the specified area, regardless of whether those workers belonged to the union. Quality Electric was ordered to pay $201,424 in damages. This decision matters for workers because it strengthens the reach of union contracts beyond just union members. When a company operates in an area covered by a collective bargaining agreement, they may be required to provide certain benefits (like pension contributions) to all workers doing that type of work, even non-union employees. This can help ensure fair compensation and benefits across an entire workforce in unionized trades.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.