Skip to main content

Volner v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

10th CircuitJanuary 31, 2013No. 11-7081Cited 9 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Holmes, Lucero, Tymkovich
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful Termination

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed summary judgment in favor of Union Pacific Railroad, concluding that the plaintiff failed to establish negligence as a matter of law, which is a required element under the Federal Employer's Liability Act (FELA).

What This Ruling Means

**Volner v. Union Pacific Railroad Company: Court Rules Against Injured Railroad Worker** Railroad worker Volner sued Union Pacific Railroad Company for wrongful termination, likely after suffering a work-related injury. The case was decided under the Federal Employer's Liability Act (FELA), a special law that covers railroad workers who get hurt on the job. The court ruled in favor of Union Pacific Railroad. The appeals court upheld a lower court's decision to dismiss the case entirely through "summary judgment" - meaning they decided Union Pacific should win without going to trial. The court found that Volner failed to prove that the railroad company was negligent, which is required under FELA to win a case. This ruling matters for railroad workers because it shows how challenging FELA cases can be. Unlike workers in other industries who have workers' compensation that doesn't require proving fault, railroad workers must prove their employer was negligent to receive benefits for work injuries. This case demonstrates that workers need strong evidence of company negligence - such as unsafe equipment, inadequate training, or violation of safety rules - to succeed in court. Railroad workers should document safety issues carefully and seek experienced legal help when injured.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.