Skip to main content

Danny Ray Franks v. Roger Bilbrey

Tenn. Ct. App.September 30, 2022No. M2021-00766-COA-R3-CV
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge D. Michael Swiney
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal - appellate court affirmed trial court judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed the trial court's ruling that the defendant contractor materially breached the contract by failing to complete the barndominium construction by the agreed-upon Thanksgiving 2018 deadline, holding that time was of the essence under the Agreement.

Excerpt

This appeal concerns an alleged breach of contract. Danny Ray Franks ("Mr. Franks") and his spouse Angela May Franks ("Ms. Franks") ("Plaintiffs," collectively) hired Roger Bilbrey ("Mr. Bilbrey") and Bilbrey's Construction, Inc. ("Defendants," collectively) to build a "barndominium," a metal building that looks like a barn with a stained-concrete floor, garage, and living quarters. The parties' contract ("the Agreement"), which was drafted by Mr. Bilbrey, provided that work would start immediately and be completed by Thanksgiving of 2018. However, the project was not completed by that date. Some five months later, the project still was unfinished. Plaintiffs then fired Defendants. Plaintiffs sued Defendants in the Chancery Court for Overton County ("the Trial Court") for breach of contract. The Trial Court ruled in Plaintiffs' favor. Defendants appeal. We hold that time was of the essence under the Agreement. We further find that Defendants committed a material breach of the Agreement by failing to timely complete Plaintiffs' barndominium. We affirm.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened:** Danny Ray Franks and his wife hired Roger Bilbrey and his construction company to build a "barndominium" - a metal building designed to look like a barn with living quarters inside. The contract, written by Bilbrey, specified that construction had to be completed by Thanksgiving 2018. However, Bilbrey failed to finish the project by this deadline. The Franks sued for breach of contract, claiming the contractor didn't fulfill his obligations under their agreement. **What the Court Decided:** Both the trial court and appeals court ruled in favor of the Franks. The courts found that Bilbrey materially breached the contract by missing the Thanksgiving 2018 deadline. The court determined that "time was of the essence" under their agreement, meaning the completion date was a critical part of the contract that couldn't be ignored or delayed without consequences. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case demonstrates that contracts with specific deadlines must be taken seriously by all parties. When agreements state that timing is essential, courts will enforce those deadlines strictly. For workers in construction or other time-sensitive industries, this ruling reinforces that meeting contractual deadlines is legally required, not optional.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.