Skip to main content

Wilfert Bros. Realty Co. v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination

MASSSUPERCTNovember 21, 2002No. No. 20022671C
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Lauriat
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliation

Outcome

The court denied motions to dismiss and allowed the case to proceed to judicial review on the merits. The court rejected the defendants' argument that the appeal was untimely filed, finding that the attorney received notice on May 28, 2002, not May 24, 2002, making the June 25, 2002 filing timely.

What This Ruling Means

**Wilfert Bros. Realty Co. v. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination** This case involved a real estate company challenging a discrimination ruling by the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination. The company was appealing the Commission's decision, but the state argued that the appeal was filed too late to be valid. The main dispute centered on when exactly the company's lawyer received official notice of the Commission's decision. The company claimed their attorney got the notice on May 28, 2002, while the state argued it was received on May 24, 2002. This timing mattered because appeals must be filed within a specific deadline. The court sided with the real estate company, determining that the attorney did receive notice on May 28, not May 24. This made their June 25, 2002 appeal filing timely and valid. The court rejected the state's request to dismiss the case and allowed it to move forward for a full review. **What this means for workers:** This ruling shows that strict deadlines in discrimination cases are taken seriously, but courts will carefully examine the facts when there are disputes about timing. It demonstrates that the appeals process remains available to both sides in discrimination cases, ensuring proper review of these important workplace protections.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.