Skip to main content

Wilfert Bros. Realty Co. v. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination

MASSSUPERCTMarch 21, 2006No. No. 0202671Cited 1 time
Plaintiff WinWilfert Bros. Realty Co.$65,294.07 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Neel, Stephen
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationWrongful Termination

Outcome

The court affirmed the Commission's decision that Wilfert Realty discriminated against David Keeling based on his disability and wrongfully terminated him. The employer was ordered to pay back wages, emotional distress damages, attorneys' fees, and costs.

What This Ruling Means

# Wilfert Bros. Realty Co. v. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination ## What Happened David Keeling worked for Wilfert Bros. Realty Co. when he experienced a disability. The company fired him, and Keeling believed his termination was unlawful discrimination based on his disability status. ## What the Court Decided The Massachusetts Supreme Court sided with Keeling. The court confirmed that the Commission Against Discrimination was correct: Wilfert Bros. Realty had indeed discriminated against Keeling because of his disability and wrongfully fired him. The company was ordered to pay Keeling $65,294.07, which included his lost wages, compensation for emotional distress, attorney fees, and court costs. ## Why This Matters for Workers This ruling reinforces that employers cannot legally fire employees because of a disability. Companies must follow the law protecting workers with disabilities from discrimination. If a worker believes they've been fired unfairly due to disability, they can challenge the decision through proper legal channels and potentially recover lost income and other damages. The ruling sends a clear message that disability-based termination has real financial consequences for employers.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.