Wilfert Bros. Realty Co.
4 distinct federal employment cases from public court records (2002–2007)
4 trusted published court opinions across 4 distinct cases
What public court records show
Public federal court records list Wilfert Bros. Realty Co. as an employer in 4 distinct federal employment cases between 2002 and 2007.
The most common claims on record were Discrimination, Wrongful Termination, and Retaliation.
These figures summarize publicly available U.S. federal court records only. Most workplace disputes are resolved privately and never appear in litigation. A case outcome reflects many factors and is not a finding that any employer violated the law.
Written decisions across 4 distinct cases.
About this employer
Wilfert Bros. Realty Co. appears in 4 trusted published federal employment opinions. Recent written decisions on record:
Wilfert Bros. Realty v. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (2007) — Plaintiff Win. Read the ruling.
Wilfert Bros. Realty Co. v. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (2006) — Plaintiff Win. David Keeling worked for Wilfert Bros. Realty Co. when he experienced a disability. The company fired him, and Keeling believed his termination was unlawful discrimination based on his disability status. Read the ruling.
Wilfert Brothers Realty Co. v. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (2004) — Defendant Win. Wilfert Brothers Realty Company challenged a decision made by Massachusetts's anti-discrimination agency. The company disagreed with how the agency handled a discrimination complaint and wanted the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case. Read the ruling.
The published opinions primarily involve Discrimination, Wrongful Termination, Retaliation. Browse the linked claim hubs for outcome statistics and other employers facing the same allegations. Discrimination, Wrongful Termination and Retaliation.
These published opinions sit within the broader workplace context.
Claim Types
What these numbers mean
A case is one lawsuit, identified by its court and docket number. The docket is the running court record for that same case — it is not an extra case.
A published opinion or ruling is a written court decision. One case can produce several opinions, so opinion counts and case counts answer different questions. Only trusted, reportable opinions are used in the outcome statistics on this page.
Docket entries are the individual filings inside a case — motions, orders, scheduling notices. We read them to confirm a case is real and to see where it got to, but an entry is never counted as a case or as an outcome. A single case can generate hundreds of entries.
Far fewer opinions than cases is normal. Many employment cases settle privately or close without a published opinion. No opinion here does not mean the worker lost; it means this public record does not show a reportable result.
Everything on this page comes from public federal court records. Where we are not confident a record is accurate, we leave it out rather than guess.
Federal court cases
public court recordsOne row per court+docket case · written opinions stay grouped inside their case · plaintiff names redacted
Other Real Estate employers
Browse trusted published opinions involving similar workplaces.
Data sourced from public federal court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes extracted using AI analysis. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The presence of an employer on this page does not imply wrongdoing — many cases are dismissed or resolved without findings of liability.