Skip to main content

Cosica v. Constructions Collaborative, Inc.

MASSSUPERCTJuly 25, 2003No. No. 005404C
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Gershengorn
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court granted T.R. White's motion for partial summary judgment, finding that a binding contract existed between T.R. White and CCI requiring CCI to obtain $2 million in liability insurance, that CCI breached this contract by failing to do so, and that the insurance provision was not voided by Massachusetts construction indemnity statute G.L.c. 149, 29C.

What This Ruling Means

**Construction Company Loses Insurance Dispute** This case involved a dispute between construction companies over insurance requirements. T.R. White had a contract with Constructions Collaborative, Inc. (CCI) that required CCI to obtain $2 million in liability insurance coverage. When CCI failed to get this insurance, T.R. White sued for breach of contract. The court ruled in favor of T.R. White, finding that CCI had indeed broken their contract by not obtaining the required insurance. CCI tried to argue that Massachusetts construction law made the insurance requirement invalid, but the court disagreed. The judge granted partial summary judgment, meaning the case was clear enough that no trial was needed on this specific issue. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This ruling reinforces that construction contracts must be honored, including insurance requirements that protect everyone on job sites. When companies are required to carry adequate insurance, it helps ensure that workers, subcontractors, and other parties are protected if accidents or problems occur. The decision shows that companies cannot simply ignore contractual obligations, even when they claim state laws excuse them from these requirements. This strengthens the reliability of construction industry agreements that often include important safety and protection provisions.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.