Skip to main content

May v. Commercial Union Insurance

MASSSUPERCTDecember 12, 2006No. No. 021466C
Defendant WinCommercial Union Insurance Company$174,929.72 at issue
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Jeffrey, Locke
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Commercial Union Insurance prevailed on its counterclaims for fraud and breach of contract. The court awarded damages of $174,929.72, representing investigative expenses and mortgage payments, with adjustments for duplication and criminal prosecution costs.

What This Ruling Means

**May v. Commercial Union Insurance: What Workers Should Know** This case involved a dispute between an employee named May and Commercial Union Insurance Company. The details of the original conflict aren't fully clear from the available information, but it appears May brought claims against the insurance company that included allegations of breach of contract and fraud. The court ruled in favor of Commercial Union Insurance. Not only did the company successfully defend against May's claims, but the court also sided with the insurance company on their counter-accusations against May. The court found that May had committed fraud and breached their contract with the company. As a result, the court ordered May to pay Commercial Union $174,929.72 in damages. This substantial amount covered the company's costs for investigating the matter and mortgage payments, though some duplicate expenses and criminal prosecution costs were excluded from the final award. This case serves as an important reminder for workers that employment disputes can sometimes backfire. If an employee brings claims against their employer that the court finds to be unfounded, they may end up facing serious financial consequences. Workers should carefully consider the strength of their case and seek proper guidance before pursuing legal action against employers.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.