Skip to main content

Ganquan Xie v. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory

9th CircuitNovember 16, 2005No. No. 04-15852
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Berzon, Leavy, Wallace
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliation

Outcome

The Ninth Circuit affirmed summary judgment in favor of the Regents of the University of California, finding that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of discrimination and retaliation, and that legitimate, non-pretextual reasons supported the employer's actions.

What This Ruling Means

**Ganquan Xie v. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory (2005)** This case involved a dispute between Ganquan Xie and Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, a government research facility, over employment-related issues. The case was heard by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in 2005, indicating it involved federal employment law matters. Unfortunately, the available court records don't provide enough detail to determine what specific employment issues were at stake or how the court ultimately ruled. The case could have involved workplace discrimination, wrongful termination, wage disputes, or other employment law violations. **What this means for workers:** While we cannot draw specific lessons from this particular case due to limited information, it demonstrates that employees have the right to challenge their employers in federal court when they believe their employment rights have been violated. The fact that this case reached the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals shows that employment disputes can be pursued through multiple levels of the court system. Workers should know that employment law protections exist at both state and federal levels, and they have legal avenues available when workplace violations occur.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.