Skip to main content

Post Tension of Nevada, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

D.C. CircuitMay 4, 2009No. Nos. 08-1297, 08-1336
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Brown, Rogers, Sentelle
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

RetaliationWhistleblower

Outcome

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals denied the employer's petition for review and granted the NLRB's cross-application for enforcement, upholding the Board's finding that Post Tension of Nevada violated the National Labor Relations Act by discriminatory work rules, threats of discharge, and refusing to provide an employment application to a union organizer.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Post Tension of Nevada, a construction company, got into trouble with federal labor officials over how it treated workers trying to organize a union. The company created workplace rules that unfairly targeted union supporters, threatened to fire workers for union activities, and refused to give a job application to someone they knew was a union organizer. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) investigated and found the company had broken federal labor law. The company disagreed and asked a federal appeals court to overturn the decision. **What the Court Decided** The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals sided completely with the NLRB. The court upheld all findings that Post Tension of Nevada violated the National Labor Relations Act through discriminatory workplace rules, threats of firing workers, and refusing to provide employment applications to union organizers. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling reinforces important protections for workers who want to organize unions or engage in other collective workplace activities. Employers cannot create special rules to target union supporters, threaten to fire workers for union involvement, or refuse to hire people because of their union connections. Workers have the right to organize without facing retaliation from their employers.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.