Skip to main content

Carey v. Local 612 International Union of Operating Engineers

9th CircuitNovember 22, 2006No. No. 05-35692
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Farris, Ferguson, Skopil
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationBreach of Contract

Outcome

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of Carey's ADA, collective bargaining agreement, and union fair representation claims, finding that the employer was not covered by the ADA due to insufficient employee count and that the union did not breach its duty of fair representation.

What This Ruling Means

**Union Member Loses Discrimination Case Due to Size Requirements** Michael Carey, a member of Local 612 International Union of Operating Engineers, sued both his union and employer claiming discrimination and unfair treatment. Carey alleged that he faced disability discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and that his union failed to properly represent him in workplace disputes, violating their duty to treat all members fairly. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Carey on all claims. The court found that his employer was too small to be covered by the ADA, which only applies to companies with 15 or more employees. Additionally, the court determined that the union had not breached its duty of fair representation, meaning they had adequately represented Carey's interests as required by law. This case highlights important limitations workers should understand. The ADA's protection against disability discrimination only applies to larger employers - smaller workplaces may not be covered. Additionally, while unions have a legal duty to represent their members fairly, this duty has limits. Workers at small companies may need to look to state laws for disability protection, as federal ADA coverage doesn't extend to all workplaces. Union members should also understand that fair representation doesn't guarantee favorable outcomes in every dispute.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.