Skip to main content

Michelson v. Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft

OHCTAPP8CUYAHOGApril 5, 2018No. No. 105960Cited 13 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Blackmon, Keough, McCormack
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed the trial court's dismissal of all three claims against Volkswagen for failure to state a claim. Michelson could not establish that Volkswagen was a 'supplier' under the Consumer Sales Practices Act, was barred as an individual consumer from bringing a Deceptive Trade Practices Act claim, and failed to properly allege a viable product liability claim.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Robert Michelson sued Volkswagen over what appears to be a dispute related to a vehicle purchase or product issue. Michelson brought three different types of claims against the automaker, including allegations under consumer protection laws and product liability theories. **What the Court Decided** The appeals court ruled in favor of Volkswagen and dismissed all of Michelson's claims. The court found several problems with his case: Volkswagen didn't qualify as a "supplier" under one consumer protection law that Michelson tried to use, he wasn't eligible as an individual consumer to bring claims under another trade practices law, and his product liability claim wasn't properly structured to succeed in court. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case highlights important limitations workers and consumers face when suing large corporations. It shows that consumer protection laws have specific requirements about who can sue and under what circumstances. The ruling demonstrates that even when people believe they've been wronged by a company, technical legal requirements can prevent their cases from moving forward. Workers should understand that successfully challenging corporations often requires meeting very specific legal standards and may need experienced legal help to navigate these complex requirements.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.