Skip to main content

National Labor Relations Board v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union No. 657

5th CircuitAugust 15, 2007No. No. 06-60438
Plaintiff Win
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Garza, Higginbotham, Wiener
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The Fifth Circuit enforced the NLRB's remedial order for back pay, finding no evidence that the Board's calculation formula was arbitrary or punitive.

What This Ruling Means

**Union Must Pay Back Wages After Court Ruling** This case involved a dispute between the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and Teamsters Local Union No. 657. The NLRB had ordered the union to pay back wages to certain workers, but the union challenged how the NLRB calculated the amount owed. The union argued that the Board's formula for determining back pay was unfair or excessive. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the NLRB and enforced the back pay order. The court found that the NLRB used a reasonable method to calculate the wages and rejected the union's arguments that the Board acted arbitrarily or was being punitive. The court also denied the union's request to review other aspects of the NLRB's decision. This ruling matters for workers because it shows that courts will uphold NLRB orders for back pay when they are calculated fairly. When unions or employers violate workers' rights under federal labor law, the NLRB can order them to make workers whole by paying lost wages. This decision reinforces that such remedies will be enforced by the courts, providing workers with meaningful protection when their labor rights are violated.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.