Skip to main content

Teamsters Union Local 287 v. National Labor Relations Board

9th CircuitSeptember 18, 2008No. Nos. 06-72964, 06-73444Cited 1 time
Defendant WinGranite Rock, Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Ninth Circuit denied the union's petition for review and granted the NLRB's cross-petition for enforcement, affirming that Local 287 violated the National Labor Relations Act by failing to bargain in good faith and upholding the retroactive effective date of the collective-bargaining contract.

What This Ruling Means

# Teamsters Union Local 287 v. National Labor Relations Board (2008) ## What Happened Teamsters Union Local 287 and Granite Rock, Inc. were in a dispute over contract negotiations. The National Labor Relations Board (the federal agency that oversees union matters) found that the union failed to negotiate honestly and in good faith with the company during their contract talks. ## What the Court Decided The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the government agency. The court upheld the finding that Local 287 violated federal labor law by not bargaining honestly. The court also confirmed that the new contract terms would take effect retroactively, meaning they would apply back to an earlier date than originally expected. ## Why This Matters for Workers This ruling reinforces that unions have legal obligations to negotiate fairly with employers, just as employers must negotiate fairly with unions. When unions fail to bargain in good faith, courts can enforce penalties and require unfavorable contract terms. Workers benefit when both sides meet their legal duties to negotiate honestly and transparently during contract discussions.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.