Pearson v. United Automobile Workers International Union
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Guy, Kethledge, Ralph, Stranch
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- appeal
- Circuit
- Sixth Circuit
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
The Sixth Circuit vacated the district court's summary judgment for the union and remanded the case, holding that the plaintiff's claim arising from the union's alleged failure to convey a settlement offer in August or September 2008 was timely under the continuing violation doctrine, even though the April 2008 offer claim was barred by the statute of limitations.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.