No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Plaintiff McCoy prevailed on his claims that the pension plan improperly calculated his disability retirement benefits and failed to apply a superseded plan provision. The court ordered the plan to pay the withheld benefits retroactive to July 1995 and to comply with statutory disclosure requirements.
McCoy v. Board of Trustees of the Laborers' International Union Pension Plan
This case involved a union member who believed his pension plan trustees incorrectly calculated his disability retirement benefits. McCoy claimed the pension plan used an outdated formula to determine his payments and failed to properly accommodate his disability-related needs. He also argued that the plan didn't provide him with required information about his benefits.
The court ruled in McCoy's favor on both issues. The judge found that the pension plan had indeed used the wrong calculation method for his disability benefits and had applied an old plan provision that should no longer have been in effect. The court ordered the pension plan to pay McCoy the benefits he should have received dating back to July 1995 and required the plan to follow proper disclosure rules going forward.
This ruling matters for workers because it shows that pension plan trustees must follow current plan rules and calculate benefits correctly. Workers have the right to challenge pension decisions in court if they believe their benefits were wrongly calculated. The case also reinforces that pension plans must provide workers with proper information about their benefits and follow legal disclosure requirements.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.