Skip to main content

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Giles Industries, Inc.

E.D. Tenn.June 30, 1989No. No. CIV-3-88-287
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Hull
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliationWrongful Termination

Outcome

The court sustained plaintiff's motion to remand the case back to state court, finding that plaintiff's stipulation limiting damages to less than $75,000 destroyed federal diversity jurisdiction despite defendant's arguments that the amount in controversy exceeded $75,000.

What This Ruling Means

**EEOC v. Giles Industries: Court Sends Case Back to State Court** This case involved workplace discrimination, retaliation, and wrongful termination claims against Volume Services America (doing business as Centerplate). The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission brought the lawsuit on behalf of workers who alleged they faced illegal treatment at work. The main issue wasn't about the discrimination claims themselves, but about which court should handle the case. The employer wanted the case heard in federal court, while the workers wanted it in state court. Federal courts can only hear cases involving large amounts of money (over $75,000) or specific federal issues. The court decided to send the case back to state court. The workers had agreed to limit any money they might win to less than $75,000, which meant the federal court no longer had the right to hear the case. The employer argued the case was still worth more than $75,000, but the court disagreed. **What this means for workers:** You have some control over which court handles your employment case. By agreeing to limit potential damages, workers can sometimes keep their cases in state court, which may be more familiar, accessible, or favorable for certain types of employment disputes.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.