Skip to main content

Barker ex rel. National Labor Relations Board v. A.D. Conner Inc.

N.D. Ill.July 11, 2011No. Case No. 11-cv-2255Cited 4 times
Plaintiff WinA.D. Conner Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Dow
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

RetaliationWrongful Termination

Outcome

The NLRB obtained a preliminary injunction against the employer for unfair labor practices, including threats to close facilities, solicitation of union decertification, and refusal to bargain. The administrative law judge found violations of Sections 8(a)(1), (3), and (5) of the National Labor Relations Act and ordered reinstatement, back pay, and recognition of the unions.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) brought a case against A.D. Conner Inc., claiming the company committed unfair labor practices. This type of case typically involves employers interfering with workers' rights to organize, join unions, or engage in other protected workplace activities. The specific details of what A.D. Conner allegedly did wrong aren't provided in the available information. **What the Court Decided** The court reached a mixed outcome in this 2011 case, meaning some claims were upheld while others were not. This suggests the court found A.D. Conner violated some labor laws but not others that were alleged. No monetary damages were reported as part of the resolution. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case reinforces that the NLRB actively pursues employers who violate workers' rights, even when the outcomes are partial victories. Workers should know they have legal protections when organizing or participating in union activities, and employers can face consequences for interfering with these rights. While not every claim may succeed in court, the NLRB's willingness to pursue these cases helps maintain workplace protections for all employees.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.