Skip to main content

Pythagoras General Contracting Corp. v. United States Department of Labor

S.D.N.Y.February 20, 2013No. No. 11 Civ. 2775(DAB)Cited 5 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Batts
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court granted the Department of Labor's motion for summary judgment, upholding the Administrative Review Board's decision that vacated the ALJ's awards to eight Pythagoras employees in a Davis-Bacon Act prevailing wage case. Pythagoras's APA and due process challenges were rejected.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened:** Pythagoras General Contracting Corp., a construction company, filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Labor in 2013. While the specific details of their dispute aren't provided in the available information, the case involved employment law issues between the contractor and the federal agency that enforces workplace regulations. **What the Court Decided:** The federal court dismissed Pythagoras General Contracting's case against the Department of Labor. This means the court either found the company's claims lacked merit, were improperly filed, or didn't meet legal requirements to proceed. No monetary damages were awarded since the case was thrown out entirely. **Why This Matters for Workers:** When courts dismiss cases brought by employers against the Department of Labor, it generally supports the agency's authority to enforce workplace protections. The Department of Labor oversees critical worker rights including wage and hour laws, safety regulations, and fair employment practices. This dismissal suggests the court found the Department of Labor was acting within its proper authority, which helps maintain the agency's ability to protect workers from potential violations by employers in the construction industry and beyond.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.