Skip to main content

Tenneco Automotive, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

D.C. CircuitMay 28, 2013No. 11-1314, 11-1353Cited 18 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Edwards, Rogers, Tatel
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

Claim Types

RetaliationFailure to Accommodate

Outcome

The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals granted Tenneco's petition for review regarding the unlawful withdrawal of Union recognition, but granted the Board's cross-application for enforcement on other unfair labor practice charges under Sections 8(a)(1), (3), and (5) of the NLRA.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Tenneco Automotive, a car parts manufacturer, got into a legal dispute with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) over how the company treated its union and workers. The company was accused of committing unfair labor practices, including retaliating against workers and improperly withdrawing recognition of their union. The case involved multiple allegations that Tenneco violated workers' rights to organize and bargain collectively. **What the Court Decided** The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a split decision in 2013. The court sided with Tenneco on one issue, ruling that the company did not unlawfully withdraw recognition of the union. However, the court supported the NLRB on other charges, finding that Tenneco did commit unfair labor practices by interfering with workers' rights, discriminating against employees, and failing to bargain in good faith with the union. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case reinforces that employers cannot retaliate against workers for union activities or interfere with their organizing rights. While companies may sometimes successfully challenge specific NLRB rulings, workers' fundamental rights to unionize and engage in collective bargaining remain protected under federal law.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.