Skip to main content

Johnson v. Strive East Harlem Employment Group

S.D.N.Y.January 2, 2014No. No. 12 Civ. 4460(HB)Cited 27 times
Plaintiff WinSTRIVE East Harlem Employment Group$153,109.59 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Baer
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
jury verdict

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliationHostile Work EnvironmentWrongful Termination

Outcome

Jury found STRIVE and Carmona liable for hostile work environment, discrimination based on gender/race in termination, and retaliation. Court granted remittitur reducing compensatory damages from $250,000 to $128,109.59, denied defendants' other motions.

What This Ruling Means

**Johnson v. Strive East Harlem Employment Group** This case involved a worker who sued her former employer, STRIVE East Harlem Employment Group, claiming she faced discrimination, retaliation, and a hostile work environment before being wrongfully fired. Johnson alleged that her supervisor, Carmona, created harmful working conditions and that she was terminated because of her gender and race. A jury sided with Johnson, finding that both STRIVE and supervisor Carmona were responsible for creating a hostile work environment, discriminating against her based on her gender and race when they fired her, and retaliating against her. The jury initially awarded Johnson $250,000 in compensatory damages, but the court later reduced this amount to $128,109.59. Combined with other damages, Johnson received a total of $153,109.59. This ruling matters for workers because it demonstrates that employers can be held financially responsible when supervisors create hostile work environments or make employment decisions based on someone's gender or race. It also shows that workers who speak up about discrimination may be protected from retaliation, and that both individual supervisors and their employers can face consequences for workplace discrimination.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.