Skip to main content

Toshiba Corp. v. Imation Corp.

W.D. Wis.December 31, 2013No. No. 09-cv-305-slc
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Citation
990 F. Supp. 2d 882, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 181571, 2013 WL 6885123
Judge(s)
Crocker
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The Department of Labor sought to enjoin the defendant from violating Fair Labor Standards Act provisions, but the court ruled that although the defendant was engaged in commerce, it qualified for the retail sales exemption under the FLSA and therefore was not required to comply with minimum wage and overtime requirements.

What This Ruling Means

**Toshiba Corp. v. Imation Corp. - Employment Dispute Dismissed** This case involved a legal dispute between two companies, Toshiba Corporation and Imation Corporation, that centered on employment-related issues. While the specific details of the workplace conflict aren't provided in the available information, the case dealt with employment law matters between these technology companies. **What the Court Decided:** The federal court dismissed the case entirely in December 2013. This means the court threw out Toshiba's claims without awarding any money damages or other remedies. When a case is dismissed, it typically means either the court found no valid legal basis for the complaint, or there were procedural problems that prevented the case from moving forward. **What This Means for Workers:** While the limited details make it difficult to draw broad conclusions, dismissed employment cases often indicate that courts require strong evidence and proper legal procedures when companies bring workplace-related claims against each other. For workers, this reinforces that employment disputes must meet specific legal standards to succeed in court. The dismissal suggests that not every employment-related conflict will result in court action, and proper documentation and legal grounds are essential for any employment case.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.