Skip to main content

Florentino Meza v. Intelligent Mexican Marketing

5th CircuitJune 18, 2013No. 12-10785Cited 46 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
DeMOSS, Dennis, Prado
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
3710 Fair Labor Standards Act
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal
State
Texas

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The Fifth Circuit affirmed summary judgment for the employer, Intelligent Mexican Marketing, Inc., finding that the plaintiff was a properly classified exempt outside salesman under the FLSA and therefore not entitled to minimum wage and overtime compensation.

What This Ruling Means

**Meza v. Intelligent Mexican Marketing: Court Dismisses Wage Violation Case** Florentino Meza sued his employer, Intelligent Mexican Marketing, claiming the company violated federal wage and hour laws under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Meza alleged that his employer failed to pay him properly for his work, which could have included issues like unpaid overtime, below minimum wage payments, or other wage violations. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit dismissed Meza's case in June 2013. This means the court threw out his lawsuit without awarding him any money or requiring his employer to change its practices. The court found that Meza's claims did not meet the legal requirements to proceed, though the specific reasons for dismissal are not detailed in the available information. **What this means for workers:** This case shows that winning wage violation lawsuits can be challenging, even when workers believe their rights have been violated. Workers who think their employer isn't paying them correctly should carefully document their hours, pay stubs, and work conditions. It's also important to understand that simply filing a lawsuit doesn't guarantee success - workers need strong evidence and proper legal procedures to win their cases.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.