Skip to main content

Kebin Valentin v. 1245, LLC

11th CircuitMay 9, 2023No. 22-12902
Mixed Result1245, LLC
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
3710 Fair Labor Standards Act
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal
State
Florida

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The Eleventh Circuit vacated in part and affirmed in part the district court's summary judgment. For Kebin Valentin, the court reversed and remanded, finding his affidavit regarding interstate phone calls created a genuine factual dispute on FLSA coverage. For Matthew Valentin and Anabely Acevedo, the court affirmed summary judgment against them because they failed to establish direct participation in interstate commerce.

What This Ruling Means

**Kebin Valentin v. 1245, LLC: What Workers Need to Know** This case involved a dispute between worker Kebin Valentin and his employer, 1245, LLC, over violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The FLSA is the federal law that sets rules for minimum wage, overtime pay, and other workplace standards. Valentin claimed his employer violated these wage and hour protections, though the specific details of what went wrong aren't provided in the available information. The case was decided by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals on May 9, 2023. However, the court's specific ruling and reasoning aren't detailed in the available records, so we don't know whether Valentin won or lost his case. **Why This Matters for Workers:** Even without knowing the outcome, this case highlights that workers have legal options when employers violate wage and hour laws. The Fair Labor Standards Act protects employees' rights to proper pay, including minimum wage and overtime compensation. Workers who believe their employer has violated these rules can file lawsuits in federal court. These cases often involve issues like unpaid overtime, working off the clock, or being misclassified as exempt from overtime pay.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.