Cleveland v. White
Case Details
- Judge(s)
- Celebrezze
- Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
- Published
- Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
- appellate review
Related Laws
No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Claim Types
Outcome
Appellate court affirmed criminal conviction for telecommunications harassment. Trial court did not err in its rulings on complaint dating, evidence admission, or jury instructions, and conviction was supported by sufficient evidence.
Excerpt
Telecommunications harassment CCO 621.10 text messages emails sufficiency of the evidence jury instruction plain error prejudice admission of testimony Evid.R. 1002 harmless error manifest weight of the evidence criminal complaint defect in indictment Crim.R. 12(C)(2) R.C. 2941.29 ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court did not err in misstating the date of the offense, treating the criminal complaint as charging two offenses, or admitting testimony from the victim regarding the content of text messages. Appellant's conviction was supported by sufficient evidence and not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Finally, appellant did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel.
What This Ruling Means
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Similar Rulings
Browse Related
Facing something similar at work?
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.