Skip to main content

Julie A. Su v. L & Y Food, Inc.

C.D. Cal.April 1, 2024No. 2:24-cv-02606
Plaintiff WinL & Y Food, Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court granted the Department of Labor's ex parte application for a temporary restraining order and order to show cause for preliminary injunction against L & Y Food, Inc. and related defendants for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act's prohibitions on oppressive child labor at a poultry processing facility in Irwindale, California. The court enjoined defendants from employing oppressive child labor, shipping hot goods into commerce, and required production of employee records and detailed accounting of goods.

What This Ruling Means

**Employment Case Summary: Su v. L & Y Food, Inc.** This case involved allegations that L & Y Food, Inc. violated federal wage and hour laws under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The plaintiff, Julie Su, claimed the company failed to follow proper pay requirements, which could have included issues like unpaid overtime, minimum wage violations, or other compensation problems. **Court Decision:** The court dismissed the case, meaning the lawsuit was thrown out without the company having to pay any damages to the worker. The specific reasons for dismissal weren't detailed in the available information. **What This Means for Workers:** This case serves as a reminder that winning wage and hour lawsuits isn't guaranteed, even when workers believe their rights were violated. Cases can be dismissed for various technical or procedural reasons, or if there isn't sufficient evidence to prove the claims. For workers facing similar situations, this highlights the importance of keeping detailed records of hours worked, pay received, and any workplace policies. It also shows why consulting with an employment attorney early can be crucial - they can help evaluate whether you have a strong case and ensure proper legal procedures are followed when filing a complaint.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.