Skip to main content

Deondre Raglin v. S and S Footwear, Inc.

C.D. Cal.May 14, 2024No. 2:24-cv-02578
Mixed ResultS and S Footwear, Inc.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliation

Outcome

The court affirmed summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs' retaliation claim but split on the national origin discrimination claim: the majority upheld dismissal while the dissenting judge would have reversed and remanded, finding sufficient evidence that a supervisor's discriminatory statements about Filipinos influenced the termination decision.

What This Ruling Means

**Worker's Disability Discrimination Case Dismissed by Court** Deondre Raglin filed a lawsuit against his employer, S and S Footwear, Inc., claiming the company discriminated against him because of a disability. The case was heard in federal court in California's Central District in May 2024. The court dismissed Raglin's case, meaning it ruled against him and the lawsuit was thrown out. The court did not award any money damages to Raglin. Unfortunately, the available court records don't provide details about what specific disability discrimination Raglin alleged or the court's reasoning for dismissing the case. **What This Means for Workers:** While this particular case was unsuccessful, workers should know they still have legal protections against disability discrimination in the workplace. Federal and state laws require employers to provide reasonable accommodations for employees with disabilities and prohibit firing or mistreating workers because of their disabilities. If you believe you've faced disability discrimination at work, it's important to document incidents and understand that each case depends on its specific facts. A dismissal in one case doesn't mean disability discrimination laws are weak – it may simply reflect issues with that particular lawsuit's evidence or legal arguments.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Discrimination casesRetaliation cases

Similar Rulings

Con Ed v. NLRB
U.S. Supreme CourtDec 1938
Mixed Result
Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
U.S. Supreme CourtFeb 1951
Remanded
Vega
2nd CircuitSep 2015
Remanded
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier Church
D.C. CircuitJul 1997
Remanded
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
U.S. Supreme CourtApr 1941
Plaintiff Win
Read Full OpinionMore S and S Footwear, Inc. RulingsAll Rulings

Browse Related

More rulings from CaliforniaMore discrimination casesMore retail employer cases

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

Check My RightsLearn the Basics

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.