No specific laws identified for this ruling.
The court approved a settlement agreement resolving the plaintiff's Fair Labor Standards Act wage claim against Alabama Plumbing Contractor LLC. The employer agreed to pay $22,614.32 in unpaid wages and $19,314.31 in liquidated damages, plus $23,071.37 in attorney fees.
Worker Sued Plumbing Company Over Unpaid Wages
In this case, an employee named Tackett filed a lawsuit against Alabama Plumbing Contractor LLC, claiming the company violated federal wage and hour laws. Specifically, Tackett alleged that the plumbing contractor failed to pay proper wages as required under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which is the federal law that sets minimum wage and overtime rules for most workers.
The court records don't provide details about the final outcome of this case or whether Tackett received any money from the lawsuit. However, the case represents a typical wage theft dispute where an employee believed their employer wasn't following federal pay requirements.
Why This Matters for Workers:
This case highlights workers' rights to fair pay under federal law. The Fair Labor Standards Act protects employees by requiring employers to pay at least minimum wage and overtime pay (time-and-a-half) for hours worked beyond 40 in a week. When employers fail to follow these rules, workers can file lawsuits to recover unpaid wages. Even though we don't know how this specific case ended, it shows that employees have legal options when they believe their employer isn't paying them correctly according to federal wage laws.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.