Skip to main content

Carter v. Cable Technology Communications LLC

N.D. Ala.February 18, 2020No. 2:18-cv-00571
Plaintiff WinOak Ridge Research, Inc.$604,764.5 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

RetaliationHarassmentWrongful TerminationHostile Work EnvironmentWhistleblower

Outcome

Plaintiff won her retaliatory discharge, assault and battery, and intentional infliction of emotional distress claims. Jury awarded compensatory damages totaling $171,800 plus $150,000 in punitive damages and $282,964.50 in attorney's fees. Appellate court affirmed the verdict in part, vacated punitive damages in part, and remanded.

What This Ruling Means

**Carter v. Cable Technology Communications LLC: Fair Labor Standards Case Dismissed** This case involved a dispute between an employee, Carter, and their employer Cable Technology Communications LLC over fair labor standards violations. Carter filed a lawsuit claiming the company failed to follow federal wage and hour laws, which typically involve issues like unpaid overtime, minimum wage violations, or improper pay calculations. The court dismissed Carter's case entirely, meaning the judge threw out the lawsuit without ruling in the employee's favor. No damages were awarded to Carter, and the case was closed. The specific reasons for dismissal aren't detailed in the available information, but dismissals can occur for various reasons such as insufficient evidence, filing deadlines being missed, or failure to prove the legal claims. **What This Means for Workers:** This outcome highlights the challenges employees face when pursuing wage and hour claims against their employers. Even when workers believe their rights have been violated, winning these cases requires meeting strict legal standards and procedural requirements. Workers considering similar lawsuits should carefully document pay issues, understand filing deadlines, and consider consulting with employment attorneys to strengthen their cases before going to court.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.