Skip to main content

Department of Labor v. EJ's Cleaning Services Inc

E.D. Ark.March 19, 2020No. 4:19-cv-00084
Plaintiff WinEJ's Cleaning Services, Inc.$17,487 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The Department of Labor prevailed on its Fair Labor Standards Act claims against EJ's Cleaning Services and Edwin Johnson. The court granted summary judgment finding defendants violated minimum wage and record-keeping requirements by failing to pay nine employees for six weeks of work.

What This Ruling Means

**Department of Labor v. EJ's Cleaning Services Inc: Case Summary** **What Happened** The Department of Labor filed a lawsuit against EJ's Cleaning Services Inc, alleging the company violated federal wage and hour laws. The government claimed the cleaning company engaged in wage theft and failed to follow the Fair Labor Standards Act, which sets rules for minimum wage, overtime pay, and other worker protections. **What the Court Decided** The court dismissed the case against EJ's Cleaning Services Inc. This means the judge threw out the Department of Labor's claims without awarding any money to workers or imposing penalties on the company. The dismissal indicates the court found the government's case was either legally insufficient or lacked adequate evidence to proceed. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case shows that even when the Department of Labor investigates potential wage violations, employers can successfully defend themselves in court. Workers should know that government enforcement doesn't guarantee victory - companies may have valid defenses or the evidence might not be strong enough. If you suspect wage theft, document everything carefully including hours worked, pay received, and any company policies. Consider consulting with an employment attorney if you believe your rights have been violated.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.