Skip to main content

Lamar Myers v. California Cabinets & Flooring, Inc.

C.D. Cal.August 7, 2020No. 2:20-cv-07010
Plaintiff WinConsolidation Coal Company$250,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
446 Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

RetaliationWhistleblower

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed the jury's verdict awarding the employee $175,000 in back pay and $75,000 in noneconomic damages for retaliatory discharge, rejecting the employer's arguments that the verdict was unsupported by evidence or excessive.

What This Ruling Means

**Worker Wins $250,000 After Being Fired for Reporting Safety Violations** Lamar Myers worked for California Cabinets & Flooring and reported safety problems or illegal activities at his workplace (the court records refer to this as "whistleblowing"). After Myers spoke up about these issues, the company fired him. Myers believed he was terminated in retaliation for reporting the problems, so he sued his former employer. A jury agreed with Myers and awarded him $250,000 in damages. The company appealed, arguing that there wasn't enough evidence to support the jury's decision and that the amount was too high. However, an appellate court disagreed and upheld the original verdict. The court confirmed that Myers should receive $175,000 in back pay (lost wages) and $75,000 for non-economic damages like emotional distress. This case is important for workers because it reinforces legal protections for employees who report safety violations or illegal conduct at work. Employers cannot legally fire workers for speaking up about legitimate workplace problems. When companies do retaliate against whistleblowers, they can face significant financial penalties, as this substantial award demonstrates. Workers should know they have legal recourse if they're punished for doing the right thing.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.