Skip to main content

Lasandra Price v. Douglas Whiteman

C.D. Cal.August 31, 2021No. 5:21-cv-01460
Defendant WinArthur Andersen LLP
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed summary judgment in favor of the Plan, finding that the Plan's decision to terminate disability benefits was not arbitrary and capricious under ERISA's deferential standard of review.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Lasandra Price worked for Arthur Andersen LLP and received disability benefits through her employer's benefit plan. The plan administrators decided to stop her disability payments, and Price sued, claiming this violated her contract and that she was entitled to continue receiving benefits. **What the Court Decided** The court sided with the employer's benefit plan. An appeals court upheld a lower court's decision that the plan administrators acted reasonably when they cut off Price's disability benefits. Under federal law governing employee benefit plans (called ERISA), courts must give significant deference to plan administrators' decisions unless they are clearly unreasonable or made in bad faith. **What This Means for Workers** This case highlights how difficult it can be for employees to challenge disability benefit decisions. When employers or their insurance companies deny or terminate disability benefits, workers face an uphill battle in court. The legal standard heavily favors plan administrators, meaning workers must prove not just that they disagree with the decision, but that it was completely unreasonable. Employees should carefully document their medical conditions and follow all plan procedures when applying for or appealing disability benefits, as these cases are hard to win in court.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.