Skip to main content

Bradford v. Professional Technical Security Services Inc (Protech)

N.D. Cal.May 27, 2020No. 3:20-cv-02242
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
720 Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage TheftRetaliation

Outcome

The court granted in part and denied in part the defendant's motion to dismiss and the plaintiff's motion to remand. The court found that the PAGA claim based on Labor Code section 204 is preempted by the LMRA and lacks federal jurisdiction, but the remaining Labor Code violations are not preempted and the case is remanded to state court except as to section 204.

What This Ruling Means

**Security Guard Loses Wage Theft Case Against Employer** A security guard named Bradford sued his employer, Professional Technical Security Services Inc. (Protech), claiming the company had stolen wages from him. The specific details of what wages were allegedly withheld are not clear from the available information, but Bradford believed his employer owed him money for work he had performed. The court dismissed Bradford's case entirely, meaning he lost his lawsuit. When a court dismisses a case, it means the judge decided the worker did not prove their claims or that there were legal problems with how the case was filed. No damages were awarded to Bradford, so he received no money from his former employer. This case shows how challenging it can be for workers to successfully prove wage theft claims in court. For workers facing similar situations, this highlights the importance of keeping detailed records of hours worked, pay stubs, and any communication about wages. Workers should also understand that winning a wage theft case requires meeting specific legal requirements and providing strong evidence. If you believe your employer has withheld wages, consider consulting with an employment attorney or contacting your state's labor department for guidance on how to properly document and pursue your claim.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.