Skip to main content

Johnson v. Serenity Transportation, Inc.

N.D. Cal.January 10, 2022No. 3:15-cv-02004
SettlementSerenity Transportation, Inc.$10,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage TheftWrongful Termination

Outcome

The court granted final approval of a $10,000 class action settlement involving wage and hour claims for misclassification, unpaid overtime, and unreimbursed business expenses. Settlement funds will be distributed pro rata to class members, with $250 service awards to named plaintiffs.

What This Ruling Means

**Johnson v. Serenity Transportation, Inc.: FLSA Wage Claim Dismissed** This case involved a worker named Johnson who sued their employer, Serenity Transportation, Inc., claiming violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The FLSA is the federal law that sets rules for minimum wage, overtime pay, and other workplace standards. Johnson likely argued that the transportation company failed to pay proper wages or overtime compensation as required by law. The court dismissed Johnson's case, meaning the judge threw it out without awarding any money to the worker. While the specific reasons for dismissal aren't detailed in the available information, courts typically dismiss FLSA cases when workers can't prove their claims, miss important deadlines, or fail to meet legal requirements for bringing the lawsuit. **What This Means for Workers:** This case serves as a reminder that winning wage and hour lawsuits requires strong evidence and proper legal procedures. Workers who believe their employers aren't paying them correctly should keep detailed records of their hours worked, pay received, and job duties. It's also important to file complaints within legal time limits. While this particular worker wasn't successful, the FLSA still provides important protections - but workers must be prepared to prove their cases in court.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.