Skip to main content

Ornelas v. Tapestry, Inc.

N.D. Cal.April 29, 2022No. 3:18-cv-06453
SettlementTapestry, Inc.$342,500 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
790 Labor: Other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
consent decree

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

Plaintiff's wage-and-hour class action against Tapestry, Inc. settled for $342,500, with final approval granted. The settlement compensates the class for unpaid wages and overtime related to security check policies, with an average payment of approximately $1,227.50 per class member.

What This Ruling Means

**Worker's Discrimination Lawsuit Against Tapestry Dismissed by Court** A worker named Ornelas filed a discrimination lawsuit against Tapestry, Inc., a luxury goods company that owns brands like Coach and Kate Spade. The employee claimed they faced illegal discrimination at work, though the specific details of what type of discrimination occurred are not provided in the available information. The federal court in California dismissed the case in April 2022, meaning the lawsuit was thrown out and did not proceed to trial. The court did not award any money damages to the worker. When a case is dismissed, it typically means either the worker failed to prove their claims met legal requirements, didn't follow proper procedures, or the court found insufficient evidence to support the discrimination allegations. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights how challenging discrimination lawsuits can be. Workers considering filing discrimination claims should ensure they have strong evidence and follow all required procedures before going to court. It's important to document incidents, report problems through company channels when appropriate, and consult with employment attorneys early in the process. A dismissal doesn't necessarily mean discrimination didn't occur, but rather that the legal case couldn't move forward under court rules.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.