No specific laws identified for this ruling.
Court approved a $2,000,000 class and collective action settlement in a wage-and-hour case brought by janitorial employees against their former employer. The settlement provides for payment to approximately 6,922 class members based on qualifying workweeks, with attorney's fees, costs, and representative service awards approved.
Worker Claims Unpaid Wages from Cleaning Company
Ceron De Orozco filed a lawsuit against Flagship Facility Services, Inc., a cleaning and maintenance company, claiming the employer failed to pay proper wages. The case was filed in December 2020 and involved allegations of wage theft under the Fair Labor Standards Act, which is the federal law that sets minimum wage and overtime requirements.
The worker claimed that Flagship Facility Services violated wage and hour laws, though the specific details of what wages were allegedly unpaid are not available from the court records. This type of case typically involves disputes over unpaid overtime, minimum wage violations, or off-the-clock work.
The court's final decision in this case is not available from the provided information, so it's unclear whether the worker won or lost, or if the case was settled.
What this means for workers: This case shows that employees can file federal lawsuits when they believe their employer has not paid them properly. The Fair Labor Standards Act gives workers the right to recover unpaid wages, and facility services workers—like janitors and maintenance staff—are generally covered by these protections. Workers who think they're not being paid correctly should keep detailed records of their hours and pay.
This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.
Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 3 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.
This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.