Skip to main content

Hernandez v. United Builder Services, Inc.

D. Colo.September 30, 2019No. 1:18-cv-02019
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil Rights: Jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court affirmed the trial court's judgment in favor of the hospital defendants, holding that even if the hospital's employment policy constituted a contract, it did not provide for the right to counsel or compulsory witness attendance, and the plaintiff failed to establish state action necessary for a constitutional due process claim.

What This Ruling Means

**Hernandez v. United Builder Services: Employee Handbook Rights Case** This case involved a worker who sued Good Samaritan Hospital after being disciplined or terminated. The employee argued that the hospital violated its own employment policies during the disciplinary process and that this violated their constitutional rights to due process (fair treatment under the law). The court ruled in favor of the hospital. The judges found that even if the hospital's employee handbook created a contract with workers, it didn't guarantee the right to have a lawyer present or to call witnesses during disciplinary proceedings. More importantly, the court determined that since the hospital is a private employer (not a government agency), constitutional due process protections don't apply to their internal disciplinary procedures. **What this means for workers:** This ruling clarifies that private employers generally don't have to provide the same legal protections during workplace discipline that government agencies do. Even when employee handbooks outline specific procedures, they typically don't create rights to legal representation during internal investigations. Workers should carefully review their employee handbooks to understand what protections they actually provide, and remember that constitutional due process rights mainly apply when dealing with government employers, not private companies.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.