Skip to main content

Carrio Cabling Corporation v. Stryker Corporation

D. Colo.October 5, 2020No. 1:19-cv-01937
Plaintiff WinState Highway Patrol$1,385.39 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
890 Other Statutory Actions
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The court affirmed the trial court's judgment requiring the state to approve and pay overtime compensation claims for two highway patrol officers (Martin and Redwine) for excess hours worked, with the superior court directing payment of $872.95 to Martin and $512.44 to Redwine.

What This Ruling Means

**Highway Patrol Officers Win Overtime Pay Case** This case involved two highway patrol officers, Martin and Redwine, who worked extra hours but weren't paid overtime compensation by their employer, the State Highway Patrol. The officers filed claims seeking payment for the additional hours they had worked beyond their regular schedules. The court ruled in favor of the officers, ordering the state to pay the overtime compensation they were owed. Martin was awarded $872.95 and Redwine received $512.44 for their unpaid overtime work. The court upheld an earlier trial court decision that had already determined the officers deserved this compensation. This ruling matters for workers because it reinforces that employers—including government agencies—must pay overtime compensation when employees work extra hours. Even public sector workers like police officers have rights to fair compensation for additional work performed. The case demonstrates that workers can successfully challenge their employers in court when overtime pay is withheld, and that courts will enforce these wage requirements. Workers who believe they're owed overtime should know that legal remedies are available, and employers cannot simply refuse to pay for hours worked beyond normal schedules.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.