Skip to main content

Bone v. XTO Energy, Inc.

D. Del.September 20, 2022No. 1:21-cv-01460
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Labor: Fair Standards
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed summary judgment in favor of PSI on strict products liability, finding that an unassembled oven under construction is not a 'product' under Section 402A. While the jury found PSI negligent at trial, Ettinger's contributory negligence (51%) exceeded PSI's negligence (49%), resulting in no recovery for plaintiff.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** A worker named Ettinger was injured while working on an unassembled oven that was under construction. He sued Production Systems Incorporated (PSI), claiming the company was negligent and that their product was defectively dangerous. The worker argued PSI should be held strictly liable for his injuries. **What the Court Decided** The appeals court ruled in favor of PSI on two key points. First, they found that an unassembled oven still under construction doesn't qualify as a finished "product" under strict liability laws, so PSI couldn't be held automatically responsible for defects. Second, even though a jury had previously found PSI was negligent, they also determined the injured worker was 51% at fault for his own injury through his careless actions, while PSI was only 49% at fault. Under the law, this meant the worker could recover nothing. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling shows that workers can lose injury cases even when their employer is found negligent if the worker's own carelessness contributed more to the accident. It also demonstrates that incomplete products or equipment under construction may not qualify for strict liability protections, making these cases harder to win.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.