Skip to main content

Woronec v. Zachry Industrial, Inc.

M.D. Fla.February 12, 2021No. 8:18-cv-02244
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
Civil Rights: Jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unknown
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal
State
Florida

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Retaliation

Outcome

The Ninth Circuit reversed the district court's dismissal of plaintiff's FMLA retaliation claim, finding that the complaint adequately alleged a causal connection between FMLA-protected leave and termination based on temporal proximity (termination approximately eleven days after return from leave), and remanded for further proceedings.

What This Ruling Means

**Worker Wins Right to Continue FMLA Retaliation Case** This case involved a worker who claimed their employer illegally fired them for taking family medical leave. The employee had used time off under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), which gives workers the right to take unpaid leave for serious health conditions or to care for family members. After returning to work, the employee was terminated approximately eleven days later. They sued, arguing the firing was retaliation for taking protected leave. The lower court initially dismissed the case, but the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed that decision. The appeals court found that the worker had presented enough evidence to suggest their firing was connected to taking FMLA leave. The key factor was the timing—being fired just eleven days after returning from leave was suspicious enough to warrant further investigation. **What This Means for Workers:** This ruling reinforces that employers cannot retaliate against employees for using their legal right to family medical leave. Workers don't need overwhelming proof upfront—if the timing between taking leave and being fired seems suspicious, courts will allow the case to proceed. This gives workers better protection when challenging potentially illegal firings related to medical leave.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Retaliation cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.